PHR Toolkits
Physicians for Human Rights Tools & Resources
Skip to content
  • Home
  • Toolkits
    • Asylum and Detention
    • Essential Medicines
    • Health & Human Rights Education
    • Health Access in Massachusetts
    • International Forensic Investigation Course
    • Istanbul Protocol Model Medical Curriculum
    • Medical Neutrality Protection Act
    • Medical Professionalism
    • Student Chapter Toolkit
  • Categories
    • Subjects
    • Issues
    • Uses
  • Downloads & Materials
    • Campaign Specific
    • Forms & Letters
    • Letterhead & Stationery
    • Logos & Graphics
    • Model Curriculum
    • Posters & Stickers
    • Slideshows & Media
    • General/Other
  • Resources & Links
    • Physicians for Human Rights
    • National Student Program
    • Articles
    • Books
    • Reports
    • Social Media
    • Networks, Groups & Forums
    • Online Tools
    • Important Organizations
    • Blogs of Interest
    • Relevant Websites
  • PHR
  • Contact
Primary loyalty to the patient
The treatment of prisoners and detainees
Toolkits > Istanbul Protocol Model Medical Curriculum > Module 2: Istanbul Protocol Standards for Medical Documentation of Torture and Medical Ethics > Medical Ethics > Dual Obligations

Dual Obligations

Printable Page Printable Page

Many health professionals have dual obligations (also referred to as ‘dual loyalties’), in that they owe a primary duty to the patient to promote his or her best interests and often a separate duty to employers. There is also a general duty to society to ensure that violations of human rights are prevented, and that the interests of . The dilemmas arising from dual obligations are particularly acute, however, for health professionals working with the police, military, and other security services or in the prison system. In these situations, either through the fact of their employment or ideological reasons, the obligations to their employer (the State) as well as the interests of their employer and their non-medical colleagues may all be in conflict with the best interests of their patients. A military doctor, for example, may belong to the very same government forces to which suspected perpetrators belong, thus interposing the loyalty to their comrades, military unit and military objectives, due to a separate obligation to the individual patient. A military or prison doctor may be under pressure to ignore allegations, or not conduct proper examinations and/or to falsify any record of their findings.

However, health professionals hold a particular duty to act impartially and to document and report any suspected ill-treatment through the appropriate channels. Health professionals must only document that which they have personally verified themselves, and they must document this truthfully, fully and accurately. Health professionals must be able to make clinical decisions independently from employers, governments, and other bodies in order to act in the best medical interests of their patients. They cannot be obliged by contractual or other considerations to compromise their professional independence.

There are various situations in which dual obligations and other ethical and legal issues may arise:

  • They could be asked to perform a medical examination prior to interrogation in order to verify that the individual will be able to withstand physical torture or other ill-treatment.
  • They could be asked to revive or treat an individual during an abusive interrogation to enable further interrogation.
  • They may be asked to provide medical knowledge or individual medical information concerning physical health or to identify psychological weaknesses or fears, that can be exploited in order to facilitate interrogation, or to develop new methods.
  • Health professionals could be asked to be complicit in the falsifying of medical reports in order to cover up any indications of abuse.

Health professionals undertaking the above tasks may be guilty of playing an active or passive role in the abuse of an individual. In all these cases the health professional must abide by the rules of medical ethics and retain their primary loyalty to the patient, refusing to participate in or condone torture or other ill-treatment, and doing all they can to end the abuse, including the full and accurate documentation of any possible psychological or physical sequelae.

It should be kept in mind that in addition to the principles of medical ethics, health professionals working for the state are also bound by the rules of international law and which could, in certain cases, lead to individual criminal responsibility of the health professional for participation in torture. Obeying the orders of a superior would not provide a defence to a charge of participation in torture.

Forensic doctors may have a different relationship with individuals they examine. In their usual function, forensic doctors have a duty to the courts, to which they provide independent medical expert opinion, even though they may be paid by one or other party. Before beginning any examination, forensic doctors must explain their role to the individual and make clear that medical confidentiality is not a usual part of their role, as it would be in
a therapeutic context, as their primary duty is to objectively document evidence that can be presented to a court. However, forensic doctors should not examine individuals without making clear the nature of their role and gaining specific consent. If consent is refused, this must be noted and respected. Depending on the jurisdiction, following such refusal by the subject, a court order may be required before any examination or taking of samples can
proceed. The forensic doctor should seek to include in their findings and report, only that medical information that is relevant to the case, and should leave out that medical information which can remain confidential to the patient (e.g. if HIV status is not relevant to the case, then it should not be raised in the findings). They must not falsify their reports but provide impartial evidence, including making clear in their reports any evidence of ill treatment.

There is consensus in international and national declarations of ethical precepts that other imperatives, including the law, cannot oblige health professionals to act contrary to medical ethics and to their conscience. In such cases, health professionals must decline to comply with the law or a regulation rather than compromise basic ethical precepts. Whatever the circumstances of their employment, all health professionals owe a fundamental duty to care for the people they are asked to examine or treat. They cannot be obliged by contractual or other considerations to compromise their professional independence. They must make an unbiased assessment of the patient’s health interests and act accordingly.

Primary loyalty to the patient
The treatment of prisoners and detainees
Printable Page Printable Page
  • Search

  • Istanbul Protocol Model Medical Curriculum

    • Preface
      • Copyright and Acknowledgements
      • Resources
      • Glossary
    • Introduction
      • Curriculum Materials
      • Summary of Content
      • How to Use These Educational Resources
    • Module 1: International Legal Standards (Overview)
      • Torture
        • What is Torture
        • Purpose of Torture
        • History of Torture
        • Other Definitions
        • Cruel Inhuman & Degrading Treatment & Punishment (CID)
        • Prohibition of Torture in International Law
        • The United Nations Convention Against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment 1984
        • Torture in the World Today
        • Country-Specific Legal Standards and Torture Practices
        • The Perpetrators
        • Common Situations for Torture Allegations
        • Where Does Torture and Ill-treatment Occur?
        • Obligation to Investigate and Bring Justice
        • Formal Inspection of Detention Facilities
        • Official Complaints to Human Rights Bodies and Other Organizations
        • Recently Released Detainees
        • NGO Information Gathering
        • Late Allegations
      • Prevention and Accountability
        • Prevention
        • Accountability
        • Reparation
      • International Supervisory Machinery and Complaints Procedures
        • The Human Rights Committee
        • The UN Committee against Torture
        • Regional Mechanisms
        • Other monitoring mechanisms
        • The UN Special Rapporteur on Torture and other Cruel, Inhuman and Degrading Treatment or Punishment
        • International criminal courts and tribunals
        • The International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC)
      • Safeguards Against Torture for Those Deprived of Their Liberty
        • Notifying people of their rights
        • Use of officially recognized places of detention and the maintenance of effective custody records
        • Avoiding incommunicado detention
        • Humane conditions of detention
        • Limits on interrogation
        • Access to a lawyer and respect for the functions of a lawyer
        • Access to a doctor
        • The right to challenge the lawfulness of detention
        • Safeguards for special categories of detainees
      • Module 1 Presentation: International Legal Standards
      • Self-Assessment and Quiz
        • Module 1 Answers
    • Module 2: Istanbul Protocol Standards for Medical Documentation of Torture and Medical Ethics
      • The Istanbul Protocol
        • About the Istanbul Protocol
        • Brief History
        • International Recognition of the Istanbul Protocol
      • An Overview of the Istanbul Protocol
        • Legal Investigation of Torture
        • General Considerations for Interviews
        • Physical Evidence of Torture
        • Psychological Evidence of Torture
        • Interpretation of Findings and Referrals
        • Misuse of the Istanbul Protocol
        • Procedural Safeguards for Detainees
      • Medical Ethics
        • Introduction
        • Duties of the health professional
        • International Codes
        • Ethical rules directly prohibiting involvement in torture
        • Primary loyalty to the patient
        • Dual Obligations
        • The treatment of prisoners and detainees
        • Issues surrounding examinations of individuals in the presence of security forces
        • Abusive medical treatment
        • Consent and confidentiality
        • Security
        • Involvement of other health professionals in torture
        • Seeking further information and support
        • Country-specific legal responsibilities of health professionals for forensic documentation of torture and ill-treatment
      • General Guidelines for Gathering Evidence and Documenting Findings
        • The aims and goals of investigation
        • Multidisciplinary approach to documentation
        • Role of the health professional in the team
        • Role of the lawyer in the team
        • Role of the NGO member in the team
        • Role of judges and prosecutors
      • Documenting the allegations
        • The aim of medical documentation
        • Types of evidence
        • Medical evidence
        • Gathering of evidence
        • Essential information
        • Quality of information
        • Comparing records
      • Module 2 Presentation: Istanbul Protocol Standards for Medical Documentation of Torture and Medical Ethics
      • Self-Assessment and Quiz
        • Module 2 Answers
    • Module 3: Interview Considerations
      • Preliminary Considerations
        • Purpose of Medical Evaluations
        • Interview Settings
        • Trust
        • Informed Consent
        • Confidentiality
        • Privacy
        • Empathy
        • Objectivity
        • Safety and Security
        • Procedural Safeguards for Detainees
        • Risk of Re-traumatisation
        • Gender Considerations
        • Interviewing Children
        • Cultural and Religious Awareness
        • Working with Interpreters
        • Transference and Counter-Transference Reactions
      • Conducting Interviews
        • Types of questions
        • Cognitive Techniques
        • Summarising and clarifying
        • Difficulties Recalling and Recounting
        • Assessing Inconsistencies
      • Interview Content
        • Identification and Introduction
        • Psychosocial History (Pre-Arrest)
        • Past Medical History
        • Summary of Detention(s) and Abuse
        • Circumstances of Detention(s)
        • Prison/Detention Place Conditions
        • Allegations of Torture and Ill-treatment
        • Review of Symptoms
        • Psychosocial History (post-arrest)
        • Assessments of Physical and Psychological Evidence
        • Physical Examination
        • Closing
        • Indications for Referral
      • Module 3 Presentation: Interview Considerations
      • Self-Assessment and Quiz
        • Module 3 Answers
    • Module 4: Torture Methods and their Medical Consequences
      • Introduction
      • Torture Methods
        • Beatings/Falanga
        • Ear Trauma
        • Eye Trauma
        • Restraint, Shackling and Positional Torture
        • Suspension
        • Crushing and Stretching Injuries
        • Burning
        • Electrical injuries
        • Asphyxiation
        • Violent Shaking
        • Sexual Assault
        • Sexual Humiliation
        • Prolonged Isolation and Sensory Deprivation
        • Sleep Deprivation
        • Temperature Manipulation
        • Sensory Bombardment
        • Threats of Harm
      • Psychological Consequences of Torture
        • Introduction
        • The Paradox of Psychological Consequences of Torture
        • The Psychological Consequences of Torture
        • Social, Political and Cultural Context
        • Risk factors for Trauma and Torture-Related Disorders
        • Psychological Symptoms
      • Module 4 Presentation: Torture Methods and their Medical Consequences
      • Self-Assessment and Quiz
        • Module 4 Answers
    • Module 5: Physical Evidence of Torture and Ill-Treatment
      • Physical Evidence of Torture
        • Medical history
      • The Physical Examination
        • Dermatologic Evaluation
        • Head and Neck
        • Chest and Abdomen
        • Musculoskeletal System
      • Neurological Examination
        • Head Trauma and Post-traumatic Epilepsy
        • Nerve Damage
      • Examination of Women
        • Examination Following a Recent Assault
        • Examination After the Immediate Phase
        • Follow-up
        • Genital Examination of Women
      • Genital Examination of Men
      • Perianal Examination
      • Medical Photography
        • Assessment for Referral
      • Diagnostic Tests
      • Module 5 Presentation: Physical Evidence of Torture and Ill-Treatment
      • Self-Assessment and Quiz
        • Module 5 Answers
    • Module 6: Psychological Evidence of Torture and Ill-Treatment
      • The Central Role of the Psychological Evaluation
        • Conducting the Psychological Evaluation
        • Psychological Findings and Diagnostic Considerations
        • Components of the Psychological/Psychiatric Evaluation
      • Children and Torture
        • Introduction
        • Developmental Considerations
        • Clinical Considerations
        • Role of the Family
      • Apendix I: Sample Psychological Evaluations
        • Psychological Evaluation #1
        • Psychological Evaluation #2
      • Apendix II: ICD-10
      • Module 6 Presentation: Psychological Evidence of Torture and Ill-Treatment
      • Self-Assessment and Quiz
        • Module 6 Answers
    • Module 7: Case Example #01
      • Introduction
      • Preliminary Considerations
      • Materials
      • Module 7 Presentation: Case Example #01
      • Self-Assessment and Quiz
        • Module 7 Answers
    • Module 8: Case Example #02
      • Introduction
      • Preliminary Considerations
      • Materials
      • Module 8 Presentation: Case Example #02
      • Self-Assessment and Quiz
        • Module 8 Answers
    • Module 9: Report Writing and Testifying in Court
      • Written Reports
        • General Considerations
        • Content of Written Reports
        • Conclusions
        • Inconsistencies
      • Providing Testimony in Court
      • Appendix: Court Testimony Guidelines and Maxims
      • Module 9 Presentation: Report Writing and Testifying in Court
      • Self-Assessment and Quiz
        • Module 9 Answers
  • Twitter Flickr Facebook LinkedIn YouTube Change.org
  • Toolkit Administration

    • Register
    • Log in
  • PHR Links

    • Physicians for Human Rights
    • About PHR
    • Blog
    • Press Room
    • Library
    • Student Program
    • Donate
    • Join
    • Subscribe
    • Take Action
    • Contact
  • RSS Press Releases

    • Wave of new warrants, arrests, and attacks on Myanmar health workers must stop: PHR
    • PHR Medical and Mental Health Experts Find that Protestors Experienced Individual and Collective Trauma from NYPD Attack in the Bronx in June 2020
    • U.S. Lifting Sanctions on ICC Staff ‘A Bare Minimum Step’ Towards Improved Engagement with the Court: PHR
    • International Criminal Court Upholds Landmark Conviction of Warlord for Atrocities Committed in the Democratic Republic of the Congo
    • Myanmar Military Targets Doctors and Besieges Civilians in Deadliest Day of Crackdown to Date: PHR
  • RSS Blog

    • Wave of new warrants, arrests, and attacks on Myanmar health workers must stop: PHR
    • PHR Medical and Mental Health Experts Find that Protestors Experienced Individual and Collective Trauma from NYPD Attack in the Bronx in June 2020
    • U.S. Lifting Sanctions on ICC Staff ‘A Bare Minimum Step’ Towards Improved Engagement with the Court: PHR
    • International Criminal Court Upholds Landmark Conviction of Warlord for Atrocities Committed in the Democratic Republic of the Congo
    • Myanmar Military Targets Doctors and Besieges Civilians in Deadliest Day of Crackdown to Date: PHR
  • RSS In the News

    • Wave of new warrants, arrests, and attacks on Myanmar health workers must stop: PHR
    • PHR Medical and Mental Health Experts Find that Protestors Experienced Individual and Collective Trauma from NYPD Attack in the Bronx in June 2020
    • U.S. Lifting Sanctions on ICC Staff ‘A Bare Minimum Step’ Towards Improved Engagement with the Court: PHR
    • International Criminal Court Upholds Landmark Conviction of Warlord for Atrocities Committed in the Democratic Republic of the Congo
    • Myanmar Military Targets Doctors and Besieges Civilians in Deadliest Day of Crackdown to Date: PHR

Physicians for Human Rights, 2 Arrow Street, Suite 301, Cambridge, MA 02138  |  Tel 617.301.4200  |  Fax 617.301.4250
© Physicians for Human Rights (PHR) 2010